docs: update refractor test plan with 2026-04-07 results #143
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
ai-changes-requested
ai-failed
ai-pr-opened
ai-reviewed
ai-reviewing
ai-working
ai-working
bug
enhancement
feature
in-queue
performance
security
tech-debt
todo
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cal/paper-dynasty-discord#143
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "docs/update-refractor-test-plan"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Update the refractor integration test plan with results from the 2026-04-07 Playwright testing session and fix incorrect command names throughout.
Changes
/card→/player,/roster→/team,/buy→/buy card-by-name,/openpack→/open-packs,/scout→/scout-tokensTesting
Documentation-only change. All test results verified via live Playwright browser automation against the dev Discord bot.
AI Code Review
Files Reviewed
tests/refractor-integration-test-plan.md(modified)Findings
Correctness
/card→/player,/roster→/team,/buy→/buy card-by-name,/openpack→/open-packs,/scout→/scout-tokens) are consistent with how slash commands are named in the codebase.get_card_embeds()looks up refractor state viacard['id'], but/playerand/buyboth callget_blank_team_card()which returns a dict without anidfield — theexcept Exception: passsilently swallows the resultingKeyError. This is a real limitation, correctly documented./scout-tokensis accurate —/scout-tokensshows remaining daily token count, not card embeds.Security
Style & Conventions
Suggestions
[x]but only REF-34 was actually tested; REF-30–33 were skipped (require alt account or API state manipulation). The sub-bullets explain this clearly, so a reader can understand the full picture — but[~](partial) might be more precise than[x](complete) for consistency with the prior convention used earlier in the file.:8081, the wording is a bit puzzling (adminer is at 8080, health is at 8081 per prerequisites). The intent is clear enough (local port forwarding conflict), but a brief clarification like "could not forward 8081 locally due to port layout" would be less ambiguous.Neither is a blocker.
Verdict: APPROVED
Documentation-only PR. Command name corrections are accurate and validated via live Playwright testing. Test results match the recently merged PRs (#141/#142). The design gap analysis for badge propagation is technically correct and useful to have on record.
Automated review by Claude PR Reviewer
Approved via pd-pr