bd49e9d61d
- Add Home Assistant deployment guide with container architecture - Document platform analysis comparing Home Assistant, OpenHAB, and Node-RED - Add voice automation architecture with local/cloud hybrid approach - Include implementation details for Rhasspy + Home Assistant integration - Provide step-by-step deployment guides and configuration templates - Document privacy-focused voice processing with local wake word detection 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
Home Automation Platform Analysis
Current Setup Analysis
- Strengths: Matter compliance, local Apple TV hub, established device ecosystem (10+ sensors, bulbs, Hue bridge)
- Limitations: Automation complexity ceiling, no external integrations, limited scheduling options
- Infrastructure: Proxmox host, Docker/Podman capability, network-local preference
Platform Comparison
1. Home Assistant (Recommended)
Pros:
- Exceptional automation engine with complex logic, scheduling, and templating
- Best-in-class local operation (no cloud required)
- Massive device integration library (2000+ integrations)
- Matter support has matured significantly since 2024
- Strong community and documentation
- Supports both container and OS deployment
Cons:
- Initial setup learning curve (but much improved)
- Device re-pairing required
- Ongoing configuration maintenance
Best For: Users wanting maximum automation flexibility and local control
2. Node-RED + Apple Home (Hybrid)
Pros:
- Keep existing device pairings intact
- Visual flow-based automation programming
- Can integrate with Apple Home via HomeKit Controller
- Good for complex orchestrations
- Local operation possible
Cons:
- Limited by Apple Home's device exposure limitations
- Requires running alongside Apple Home ecosystem
- Less device integration options than HA
- May hit Apple Home API rate limits on complex automations
Best For: Users wanting advanced automations without disrupting existing setup
3. Home Assistant + Apple Home Bridge (Best of Both)
Pros:
- Keep Apple Home interface for family while gaining HA automation power
- All devices managed in HA, exposed to Apple Home selectively
- Maximum automation capabilities + familiar interface
- Local operation maintained
Cons:
- Most complex initial setup
- Device re-pairing required
- Two systems to maintain
Architecture Recommendations
Option A: Full Home Assistant Migration
- Deploy HA in Proxmox container/VM
- Re-pair all devices to HA directly
- Build automations in HA
- Use HA mobile app + dashboards
Option B: HA + HomeKit Bridge Hybrid
- Deploy HA in Proxmox container/VM
- Re-pair devices to HA
- Use HomeKit Controller integration to expose selected devices/automations back to Apple Home
- Family continues using Apple Home interface, you get HA automation power
Option C: Node-RED Overlay (Conservative)
- Deploy Node-RED in container
- Keep all devices paired to Apple Home
- Use Node-RED HomeKit Controller to read Apple Home state
- Build complex automations in Node-RED
- Control devices through Apple Home APIs
Technical Considerations
Deployment Method: Podman Container (Recommended)
- More flexible than Home Assistant OS
- Easier backup/restore
- Better resource control in Proxmox
- GPU passthrough compatibility you already have
Matter Device Strategy
- Modern Home Assistant has excellent Matter support
- Re-pairing is straightforward with Matter devices
- Thread network can be shared between platforms
Next Steps Recommendation
Start with Option A (Full HA Migration) because:
- Your technical comfort level makes setup manageable
- Device re-pairing is acceptable to you
- Local-only operation is priority
- You want maximum automation flexibility
- Container deployment aligns with your infrastructure