store: Cloud embedding APIs offer no advantage over local qwen3-embedding:8b
This commit is contained in:
parent
99114ea561
commit
b3023a9bf7
@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 97866ffd-f148-4dda-b4c6-7cd9c7861b63
|
||||
type: insight
|
||||
title: "Cloud embedding APIs offer no advantage over local qwen3-embedding:8b"
|
||||
tags: [embedding, privacy, openai, ollama, comparison]
|
||||
importance: 0.6
|
||||
confidence: 0.8
|
||||
created: "2026-02-19T20:53:23.330619+00:00"
|
||||
updated: "2026-02-19T20:53:23.330619+00:00"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Researched all major cloud embedding APIs (Feb 2026): OpenAI text-embedding-3-large (64.6 MTEB, $0.065-0.13/1M tokens), Google gemini-embedding-001 (68.3, $0.15/1M), Voyage AI voyage-3.5 (66-67, $0.06/1M), Cohere embed-v4 (65.2, ~$0.10/1M). Local qwen3-embedding:8b scores ~70.6 MTEB — beats all of them. Privacy comparison: OpenAI retains 30 days; Voyage AI trains on data by default with irrevocable license (!); Google paid API doesn't train; Cohere opt-in. Local = free + fully private + highest quality. No reason to use cloud for this use case.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user