Add Chrome vs playwright-cli positioning guide
Clarifies when to use native Chrome integration vs playwright-cli (headless automation, network mocking, persistent sessions, SSH/containers). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
67337a6771
commit
7f745fc061
@ -6,6 +6,17 @@ allowed-tools: Bash(playwright-cli:*)
|
||||
|
||||
# Browser Automation with playwright-cli
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use This vs Native Chrome
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Use |
|
||||
|----------|-----|
|
||||
| Interactive testing, visual debugging | Native Chrome integration |
|
||||
| Quick form automation in your session | Native Chrome integration |
|
||||
| Headless/unattended automation (scheduled tasks) | playwright-cli |
|
||||
| Persistent sessions across prompts | playwright-cli |
|
||||
| Network mocking / route interception | playwright-cli |
|
||||
| Running in containers or SSH sessions | playwright-cli |
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick start
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user